Startup and MSME Fee Concessions Under the Trade Marks Rules, 2017: A Complete Practical Guide

1. Introduction: The 50% Most Eligible Applicants Never Claim

The Trade Marks Rules, 2017 did two things to fees at once. They raised the standard application fee sharply — from ₹4,000 per class under the 2002 Rules to ₹9,000 for e-filing — and they created an entirely new applicant category paying roughly half of that.

That new category is “Individual / Startup / Small Enterprise.” For an applicant who qualifies, the e-filing fee for Form TM-A is ₹4,500 per class instead of ₹9,000. On a five-class portfolio, that is ₹22,500 saved for the price of uploading a certificate the business may already hold.

And yet a very large number of eligible applicants pay full price. The reasons are consistent and avoidable:

• They assume “small enterprise” means a tiny business, when the Rules actually define it by reference to the medium enterprise ceiling under the MSMED Act — a threshold that was raised substantially with effect from 1 April 2025 and now captures companies with investment up to ₹125 crore and turnover up to ₹500 crore.
• They do not hold a Udyam Registration Certificate at the time of filing, and discover afterwards that the concession cannot be claimed retrospectively.
• They file in a company’s name while the DPIIT startup recognition sits with a different entity.
• They add a non-qualifying joint applicant and lose the concession entirely.
• They assume the concession runs across the whole lifecycle of the mark, budget accordingly, and are surprised at renewal.

This article sets out precisely who qualifies, what the Rules actually say, what the concession is worth, which fee entries it applies to and which it does not, what documents must be filed and when, how the 2025 MSME revision changed the picture, and how to structure a filing so the concession is claimed legitimately rather than lost or wrongly asserted.

This is general information on Indian trade mark practice as of 2026, not legal advice. Fee schedules and MSME thresholds are revised from time to time — verify the current First Schedule to the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 on ipindia.gov.in and the current MSME notification before budgeting or filing.

---

2. The Statutory Architecture

2.1 Where the Concession Lives

The concession is not in the Trade Marks Act, 1999. It is entirely a creature of the Rules:

• Rule 10 and the First Schedule to the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 prescribe the fees, and the First Schedule sets out two columns of fees for the relevant entries — one for “Individual/Startup/Small Enterprise” and one for “Others.”
• Rule 2 defines “Startup” and “Small Enterprise.”
• Rule 34 governs expedited processing, which also carries a two-tier fee.

The 2017 Rules also rationalised the forms — from around 75 down to a handful, with Form TM-A for applications and Form TM-O for oppositions — and reduced the First Schedule to a much shorter list of fee entries. Understanding which of those entries carry two tiers is the single most useful piece of budgeting knowledge in Indian trade mark practice.

2.2 The Three Qualifying Categories

The concessional column applies to:

1. Individuals (including sole proprietors, since a sole proprietorship has no separate legal existence and the applicant is the individual)
2. Startups as defined in Rule 2
3. Small Enterprises as defined in Rule 2

Everyone else — companies, LLPs, partnerships, trusts, societies, HUFs, foreign entities — pays the “Others” rate unless they independently qualify as a Startup or a Small Enterprise.

This is the crucial framing. Being a private limited company does not disqualify you. It simply means you must qualify through the Startup or Small Enterprise route rather than automatically.

---

3. What the Concession Is Actually Worth

3.1 Application Fees (Form TM-A)

Two features are stacked here: the 50% category concession, and a further 10% discount for e-filing over physical filing. There is no rational case for physical filing in 2026 — it costs more, produces no instant acknowledgement, and offers no procedural advantage.

3.2 Expedited Processing (Rule 34)

Under the 2002 Rules only examination could be expedited. The 2017 Rules extended expedited processing through to registration, which makes this entry considerably more valuable than it was — and the concession halves its cost.

3.3 The Per-Class Multiplier

Because Section 18(2) of the Act charges fees per class, the concession multiplies across classes. This is where the money actually is:

Note that this is identical whether the classes are filed as separate single-class applications or bundled into one multi-class application — the fee is per class either way, and the concession applies per class either way.

3.4 The Whole-Lifecycle Reality

Here is where budgets go wrong. The concession is front-loaded. It applies to a small number of entries in the First Schedule — principally the application itself and expedited processing. It does not extend across the full life of a mark.

In particular, applicants should not assume a concessional rate for:

• Renewal on Form TM-R
• Opposition on Form TM-O
• Rectification and cancellation proceedings
• Most Form TM-M requests
• The well-known mark determination under Rule 124, which carries a flat fee of ₹1,00,000

Always check the current First Schedule entry for the specific form before quoting a figure to a client. The safe planning assumption is: the concession gets you into the system cheaply; it does not keep you there cheaply.

---

4. Category One: Individuals

The simplest category and the most under-used.

Who qualifies: any natural person. This includes sole proprietors, because a sole proprietorship is not a separate legal person — the applicant is the individual, typically named as “Rajesh Kumar Sharma trading as Sharma Enterprises.”

Documents required to claim: none specific to the concession. Standard identity proof (PAN, Aadhaar) suffices. No certificate, no registration, no declaration of turnover.

The catch: filing in an individual’s name to capture the concession has real downstream consequences if the business is, or will become, a company. The mark then sits outside the operating entity, and moving it in later requires a deed of assignment, stamp duty, and a Registry recordal on Form TM-P — a cost that typically exceeds the amount saved. Investors treat brand ownership outside the company as a condition precedent to closing.

Use the individual route when the individual genuinely is the business, or where the company does not yet exist. Do not use it as a fee-avoidance device for an operating company.

---

5. Category Two: Startups

5.1 The Rule 2 Definition

Rule 2 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 defines “Startup” as an entity in India recognised as a startup by the competent authority under the Startup India initiative. For a foreign entity, it means an entity fulfilling the criteria for turnover and period of incorporation or registration as per the Startup India notification, and submitting a declaration to that effect.

Note the structure. The Rules do not lay down their own criteria for Indian entities. They cross-refer to the Startup India framework administered by DPIIT. That means the definition moves whenever DPIIT’s criteria move, without any amendment to the Trade Marks Rules.

5.2 The Current DPIIT Criteria

Broadly, an entity qualifies for DPIIT recognition where:

• It is incorporated as a private limited company, registered partnership firm, or LLP
• It is within ten years of the date of incorporation or registration
• Its turnover has not exceeded ₹100 crore in any financial year since incorporation
• It is working towards innovation, development or improvement of products, processes or services, or has a scalable business model with high potential for employment generation or wealth creation
• It was not formed by splitting up or reconstruction of an existing business

The ten-year and ₹100 crore figures reflect DPIIT’s expansion of the original criteria, which were five years and ₹25 crore. Older commentary — including some still circulating online about the 2017 Rules — quotes the earlier figures. Because Rule 2 cross-refers dynamically, the current DPIIT criteria govern.

5.3 What Must Be Filed

The DPIIT recognition certificate must be uploaded with Form TM-A. The Registry mandatorily requires the startup recognition certificate to grant the concessional rate. Without it, the application will be treated as filed with a fee deficiency.

5.4 Practical Points

• Recognition takes time. Apply for DPIIT recognition on the Startup India portal before you need to file the trade mark application, not after.
• The recognition must be in the name of the applicant entity. A startup recognition held by a related company does not help.
• Recognition can lapse on completion of ten years or on crossing the turnover threshold. Check the certificate’s validity at the date of filing.
• Foreign startups may qualify under the foreign-entity limb, but must satisfy the turnover and incorporation-period criteria and submit the required declaration.

---

6. Category Three: “Small Enterprise” — The Most Misunderstood Definition in Indian Trade Mark Practice

This is where the real money is, and where almost everyone gets it wrong.

6.1 What Rule 2 Actually Says

Rule 2 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 defines “Small Enterprise” as:

• in the case of an enterprise engaged in the manufacture or production of goods, an enterprise where the investment in plant and machinery does not exceed the limit specified for a MEDIUM enterprise under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006; and
• in the case of an enterprise engaged in providing or rendering services, an enterprise where the investment in equipment is not more than the limit specified for a MEDIUM enterprise under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 7 of that Act.

Read that again. Despite being labelled “Small Enterprise,” the Trade Marks Rules define the category by reference to the medium enterprise ceiling.

The practical consequence: micro, small AND medium enterprises all fall within the concessional category for trade mark filing purposes.

This is not a drafting curiosity to be argued about — it is the plain text of Rule 2, and it dramatically widens the pool of eligible applicants beyond what most businesses and many advisers assume.

6.2 The Ceiling Has Moved — Twice

Because Rule 2 cross-refers to Section 7(1) of the MSMED Act, the Trade Marks concession threshold moves whenever the MSME classification moves. It has moved twice since the 2017 Rules were notified.

Original position (2006–2020). Medium enterprise limits were investment in plant and machinery up to ₹10 crore (manufacturing) and investment in equipment up to ₹5 crore (services). Most commentary on the 2017 Rules still quotes these figures.

2020 revision. Notification S.O. 2119(E) dated 26 June 2020 replaced the investment-only test with a composite criterion of investment and turnover, applied uniformly to manufacturing and services. Medium enterprise: investment up to ₹50 crore and turnover up to ₹250 crore.

2025 revision. The Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises issued Notification S.O. 1364(E) dated 21 March 2025, effective 1 April 2025, raising investment limits by 2.5 times and turnover limits by 2 times, superseding the 2020 notification.

6.3 The Current MSME Classification (from 1 April 2025)

Key features of the current framework:

• The criterion is composite — both investment and turnover must stay within the band. Crossing either ceiling moves the enterprise to the next category.
• The classification applies uniformly to manufacturing and service enterprises; the earlier sectoral distinction is gone.
• Exports are excluded from turnover, so a strong export year does not push an enterprise up a bracket.
• Under Section 8(6) of the MSMED Act, where classification changes due to reclassification or actual change in investment or turnover, the enterprise remains in its current category until the end of the financial year.

6.4 Why This Matters Enormously

Combine Rule 2’s cross-reference to the medium ceiling with the 1 April 2025 revision, and the result is striking: an enterprise with investment up to ₹125 crore and turnover up to ₹500 crore can fall within the Trade Marks Rules’ “Small Enterprise” category.

That is not a small business by any ordinary usage. It is a substantial mid-market company — and it is paying ₹9,000 per class when it could be paying ₹4,500.

6.5 An Honest Note on an Interpretive Wrinkle

Rule 2 refers separately to clauses (a) and (b) of Section 7(1) of the MSMED Act, reflecting the original manufacturing/services split. The 2020 and 2025 notifications unified the classification and introduced a composite investment-plus-turnover test that no longer maps neatly onto that split.

In practice, the Registry works from the Udyam Registration Certificate, which states the enterprise’s current classification. The pragmatic approach is therefore:

• Obtain Udyam registration.
• File the certificate with Form TM-A.
• Let the certificate speak to the classification rather than attempting to argue the underlying arithmetic.

Where the position is borderline or the amounts at stake are significant, confirm current Registry practice before relying on the concession.

6.6 What Must Be Filed

The Udyam Registration Certificate (which replaced Udyog Aadhaar and the earlier EM-II memorandum) must be uploaded with Form TM-A. The Registry mandatorily requires the MSME certificate to grant the concessional rate.

The certificate must be:

• In the name of the applicant entity, not a related company, not a promoter
• Valid as at the date of filing
• Uploaded with the application, not supplied later

---

7. Which Fee Entries Carry the Concession

A short but important section, because this is where budgeting errors originate.

The correct planning statement to a client is: “You will save roughly half on filing and on expedited processing. Budget full rates for everything after that.”

---

8. Joint Applicants: The Trap That Erases the Concession

Where an application is filed jointly, the concession is not available if any joint applicant does not meet the criteria. An eligible individual or startup filing jointly with a company, trust or partnership that does not qualify will pay the “Others” rate for the whole application.

This is a genuine trap in co-branded ventures, family arrangements, and founder-plus-company filings. Before adding a joint applicant, check:

1. Does each applicant independently qualify?
2. Is joint ownership even permissible? Section 24 of the Act bars registration in the names of two or more persons as joint proprietors unless the mark is used, or proposed to be used, by them jointly in the course of trade.

Often the right answer is a single qualifying applicant plus a written licence to the other party — which preserves both the concession and a much cleaner ownership structure.

---

9. Documentation and Timing

9.1 The Checklist

9.2 The Timing Rule That Costs People Money

The certificate must exist and be filed at the time of the application. Claiming the concessional fee without uploading the supporting certificate results in a deficiency notice and a demand for the fee shortfall. Retrospective claims — “we were eligible at the time, we just did not have the certificate yet” — are not accepted as a matter of routine practice.

The sequence is therefore:

1. Obtain Udyam registration or DPIIT recognition first
2. Confirm the certificate is in the exact name of the intended applicant
3. Then file Form TM-A, uploading the certificate and selecting the concessional category

Udyam registration is free and can be completed online on the Udyam portal reasonably quickly. For a business filing across several classes, the return on that administrative step is measured in tens of thousands of rupees.

---

10. Status Changes After Filing

Two related questions arise regularly.

What if the enterprise grows beyond the threshold after filing? The application was validly filed at the concessional rate on the basis of the position at the date of filing. Section 8(6) of the MSMED Act also provides that where classification changes, the enterprise remains in its current category until the end of the financial year. Unlike the Patents Rules, the Trade Marks Rules do not contain an equivalent express clawback mechanism requiring payment of the fee differential on loss of status — but the position is not identically drafted across the two regimes, so confirm current Registry practice where material sums are involved.

What if the application is assigned to a non-eligible entity? This is the more realistic scenario — a founder files individually and later assigns to the company. The assignment itself has its own costs (deed, stamp duty, Form TM-P recordal). Whether the Registry raises a fee differential is a question of current practice rather than a clearly settled rule, and it should be confirmed rather than assumed.

The prudent approach is to file in the name of the entity that will hold the mark long term, and to treat the concession as a benefit of that entity’s genuine status rather than as a reason to file in a name that will have to change.

---

11. The Wider Startup IP Support Framework

The fee concession is one part of a broader package. Startups should also be aware of:

The SIPP scheme (Scheme for Facilitating Startups Intellectual Property Protection), under which DPIIT empanels facilitators whose professional fees for filing and prosecuting trade mark and patent applications on behalf of recognised startups are borne by the Government, with the startup bearing only the statutory fees. For a startup, this can reduce the cost of a trade mark filing to close to the ₹4,500 per class statutory fee alone.

Expedited processing under Rule 34, at the concessional ₹20,000, which for a startup racing to secure a brand before a funding round or product launch is often worth every rupee — particularly since the 2017 Rules extended expedited processing all the way through to registration rather than stopping at examination.

Verification before relying on any of this. Scheme parameters, facilitator panels and fee structures change. Check the current position on the Startup India portal and ipindia.gov.in.

---

12. Worked Examples

Example A — Solo founder, pre-incorporation, two classes. Files as an individual. No certificate needed. Fee: ₹4,500 × 2 = ₹9,000 instead of ₹18,000. Saving ₹9,000. Plan and budget the later assignment into the company.

Example B — Three-year-old private limited company, DPIIT recognised, four classes. Uploads the DPIIT certificate. Fee: ₹4,500 × 4 = ₹18,000 instead of ₹36,000. Saving ₹18,000. Also eligible for expedited processing at ₹20,000 instead of ₹40,000, and potentially for facilitator support under SIPP.

Example C — Manufacturing company, investment ₹40 crore, turnover ₹180 crore, five classes. Under the pre-2025 thresholds this company was a medium enterprise. Under the current classification effective 1 April 2025 it remains within the medium band (investment up to ₹125 crore, turnover up to ₹500 crore) — and because Rule 2 defines “Small Enterprise” by reference to the medium ceiling, it qualifies for the concession. With Udyam registration in place: ₹4,500 × 5 = ₹22,500 instead of ₹45,000. Saving ₹22,500. Most companies of this size assume they do not qualify and pay full price.

Example D — Startup filing jointly with a large corporate partner, three classes. Concession lost because one joint applicant does not qualify. Fee: ₹9,000 × 3 = ₹27,000. Better structure: the startup applies alone and licenses the corporate partner — saving ₹13,500 and producing a cleaner ownership position under Section 24.

---

13. Common Mistakes

1. Assuming “small enterprise” means small. Rule 2 uses the medium enterprise ceiling. Check before assuming ineligibility.
2. Working from pre-2025 MSME thresholds. The limits changed on 1 April 2025 via S.O. 1364(E). Any guide showing ₹50 crore investment / ₹250 crore turnover for medium is out of date.
3. Filing before obtaining the certificate. The certificate must accompany Form TM-A.
4. Certificate in the wrong name. It must be in the applicant entity’s name, not a promoter’s or a group company’s.
5. Adding a non-qualifying joint applicant, erasing the concession for the entire application.
6. Filing in an individual’s name purely to save fees when the operating business is a company, creating an expensive assignment obligation later.
7. Assuming the concession runs through renewal and opposition. It does not; budget full rates.
8. Choosing physical filing, which costs ₹500 more per class and delivers nothing.
9. Letting DPIIT recognition lapse and filing on a certificate that is no longer valid.
10. Overlooking the per-class multiplier, and therefore under-appreciating how much a multi-class portfolio saves.

---

14. Conclusion

The Individual/Startup/Small Enterprise concession is the most generous and most under-claimed benefit in Indian trade mark practice. It halves the statutory cost of getting a brand onto the Register, and it halves the cost of expedited processing on the way there.

Two facts drive almost every missed claim. The first is the label: “Small Enterprise” sounds like it means a small business, when Rule 2 in fact defines it by reference to the medium enterprise ceiling under the MSMED Act — a ceiling that, since 1 April 2025, sits at ₹125 crore of investment and ₹500 crore of turnover. The second is timing: the concession must be claimed at filing, with the certificate in hand, in the applicant’s own name.

Both are fixable with an hour of administrative work. Obtain Udyam registration or DPIIT recognition in the correct entity’s name. Confirm it is valid. Upload it with Form TM-A. Choose e-filing. Avoid non-qualifying joint applicants. And budget full rates for everything after registration, because the concession is a door-opener, not a season ticket.

For a business protecting a brand across four or five classes, that hour is worth ₹18,000 to ₹22,500 in statutory fees alone — before counting the halved cost of expedited processing and, for recognised startups, the possibility of facilitator support under SIPP.

---

15. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How much is the startup/MSME trade mark fee concession worth?

A. Roughly 50%. For Form TM-A, an Individual, Startup or Small Enterprise pays ₹4,500 per class for e-filing (₹5,000 physical) against ₹9,000 per class (₹10,000 physical) for all other applicants. For expedited processing under Rule 34, the fee is ₹20,000 instead of ₹40,000.

2. Where is the concession actually found in the law?

A. Entirely in the Rules, not the Act. Rule 10 and the First Schedule to the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 prescribe the two-tier fees, Rule 2 defines “Startup” and “Small Enterprise,” and Rule 34 governs expedited processing with its own two-tier fee.

3. Who exactly qualifies for the concessional rate?

A. Three categories: individuals (including sole proprietors), Startups as defined in Rule 2, and Small Enterprises as defined in Rule 2. Companies, LLPs, partnerships, trusts, societies, HUFs and foreign entities pay the higher rate unless they independently qualify as a Startup or Small Enterprise.

4. Does “Small Enterprise” mean a small business?

A. No, and this is the most misunderstood point in the whole area. Rule 2 defines “Small Enterprise” by reference to the limit specified for a medium enterprise under Section 7(1) of the MSMED Act, 2006. So micro, small and medium enterprises all fall within the concessional category for trade mark filing purposes.

5. What are the current MSME thresholds?

A. Effective 1 April 2025, under Notification S.O. 1364(E) dated 21 March 2025: micro — investment up to ₹2.5 crore and turnover up to ₹10 crore; small — ₹25 crore and ₹100 crore; medium — ₹125 crore and ₹500 crore. Because Rule 2 uses the medium ceiling, an enterprise within the medium band can claim the trade mark concession.

6. My company has ₹40 crore investment and ₹180 crore turnover. Do I really qualify?

A. On the current classification, that sits within the medium enterprise band, and Rule 2’s cross-reference to the medium ceiling means the concession is available — provided you hold a valid Udyam Registration Certificate in the company’s name and file it with the application. Most companies of this size assume they are ineligible and pay full price.

7. Are the old ₹10 crore and ₹5 crore figures still relevant?

A. No. Those were the pre-2020 medium enterprise limits for manufacturing and services respectively, and a great deal of online commentary on the 2017 Rules still quotes them. They were superseded by Notification S.O. 2119(E) of 26 June 2020 and again by S.O. 1364(E) effective 1 April 2025.

8. Is the MSME test based on investment or turnover?

A. Both. The criterion is composite — an enterprise must stay within both the investment and the turnover ceiling for its category. Crossing either one moves it into the next category. Exports are excluded from the turnover computation.

9. Does the manufacturing versus services distinction still matter?

A. Not under the current MSME notification, which applies uniformly to manufacturing and service enterprises. Rule 2 of the Trade Marks Rules still refers separately to clauses (a) and (b) of Section 7(1), reflecting the older split, so there is a textual wrinkle. In practice the Registry works from the Udyam Registration Certificate, which states the current classification.

10. What document do I need to claim the Small Enterprise rate?

A. The Udyam Registration Certificate, which replaced Udyog Aadhaar and the earlier EM-II memorandum. It must be in the name of the applicant entity, valid at the date of filing, and uploaded with Form TM-A.

11. What document do I need to claim the Startup rate?

A. The DPIIT recognition certificate issued under the Startup India initiative, in the applicant entity’s name and valid at the date of filing, uploaded with Form TM-A. The Registry mandatorily requires it before granting the concessional rate.

12. What are the DPIIT startup criteria?

A. Broadly: incorporation as a private limited company, registered partnership firm or LLP; within ten years of incorporation or registration; turnover not exceeding ₹100 crore in any financial year since incorporation; working towards innovation, development or improvement of products, processes or services, or having a scalable model with high employment or wealth-creation potential; and not formed by splitting up or reconstructing an existing business.

13. Some sources say startups must be under five years old with turnover under ₹25 crore. Which is right?

A. The five-year and ₹25 crore figures were the original 2016 criteria, and they appear in a lot of older commentary on the 2017 Rules. DPIIT subsequently expanded the criteria to ten years and ₹100 crore. Rule 2 cross-refers dynamically to the Startup India framework, so the current DPIIT criteria govern.

14. Can I claim the concession after filing if I get the certificate later?

A. No, as a matter of routine practice. The certificate must exist and be uploaded with the application. Claiming the concessional fee without the supporting certificate produces a deficiency notice and a demand for the fee shortfall. Obtain the registration first, then file.

15. My promoter holds Udyam registration personally. Does my company get the concession?

A. No. The status attaches to the applicant entity. A certificate in a promoter’s or a group company’s name does not qualify the applicant. If the company can obtain its own Udyam registration, do so before filing.

16. Do individuals need any certificate?

A. No. Any natural person qualifies for the concessional rate, and no startup or MSME certificate is required. Standard identity proof suffices.

17. Should I file in my personal name just to get the cheaper fee?

A. Only if you genuinely are the business, or if the company does not yet exist. Filing personally when the operating business is a company means the brand sits outside the company, and moving it in later requires a deed of assignment, stamp duty and a Form TM-P recordal — usually costing more than the fee saved. Investors treat it as a condition precedent to closing.

18. Does the concession multiply across classes?

A. Yes, because Section 18(2) charges fees per class. Five classes at the concessional rate cost ₹22,500 against ₹45,000, a saving of ₹22,500. This is where the real value sits for any business protecting a brand across multiple classes.

19. Is a multi-class application cheaper than separate applications for a concessional applicant?

A. No. The fee is per class either way, and the concession applies per class either way. The choice between multi-class and single-class filing is a risk decision, not a fee decision.

20. Does the concession apply to renewal fees?

A. Do not assume so. The concession is front-loaded and applies to a small number of First Schedule entries, principally the application and expedited processing. Check the current Schedule entry for Form TM-R before budgeting, and plan on full rates for post-registration steps.

21. Does it apply to opposition and rectification proceedings?

A. Again, do not assume so. Check the current First Schedule for the relevant form. The safe planning statement is that the concession gets you into the system cheaply but does not keep you there cheaply.

22. What about the well-known mark application under Rule 124?

A. That carries a flat fee of ₹1,00,000 with no concessional tier.

23. What happens to the concession if I file jointly with another party?

A. It is lost if any joint applicant fails to meet the criteria. An eligible startup filing jointly with a large corporate partner pays the “Others” rate for the whole application.

24. What is the better structure for a co-branded venture?

A. Usually a single qualifying applicant plus a written licence to the other party. This preserves the concession and produces a cleaner ownership position — bearing in mind that Section 24 bars joint proprietorship anyway unless the mark is used, or proposed to be used, by the parties jointly in the course of trade.

25. What if my enterprise grows past the threshold after filing?

A. The application was validly filed at the concessional rate based on the position at the date of filing, and Section 8(6) of the MSMED Act provides that an enterprise remains in its current category until the end of the financial year when classification changes. The Trade Marks Rules do not contain an express clawback equivalent to that in the Patents Rules, but the two regimes are not drafted identically — confirm current Registry practice where material sums are involved.

26. What if I assign the application to a non-eligible entity later?

A. The assignment carries its own costs — deed, stamp duty, Form TM-P recordal. Whether the Registry raises a fee differential is a question of current practice rather than a plainly settled rule. The prudent course is to file in the name of the entity that will hold the mark long term.

27. Is e-filing really cheaper?

A. Yes, by ₹500 per class for concessional applicants and ₹1,000 per class for others, on top of the category concession. E-filing also gives an instant acknowledgement and digital tracking. There is no sound reason to file physically in 2026.

28. What is the SIPP scheme?

A. The Scheme for Facilitating Startups Intellectual Property Protection, under which DPIIT empanels facilitators whose professional fees for filing and prosecuting trade mark and patent applications for recognised startups are borne by the Government, leaving the startup to pay only the statutory fees. Combined with the concessional rate, this can bring a startup’s filing cost close to ₹4,500 per class.

29. Is expedited processing worth the concessional ₹20,000?

A. Often, for a startup racing a funding round or product launch. The 2017 Rules extended expedited processing beyond examination all the way through to registration, which made the entry substantially more valuable than it was under the 2002 Rules, and the concession halves its cost.

30. Can a foreign startup or foreign small enterprise claim the concession?

A. Rule 2 contains a foreign-entity limb for startups — an entity fulfilling the turnover and incorporation-period criteria per the Startup India notification, and submitting a declaration to that effect. Indian Udyam registration is not available to foreign entities, so the Small Enterprise route is generally unavailable to them. Verify the current position before relying on it.

31. What is the single most common reason eligible applicants pay full price?

A. They assume the “Small Enterprise” label means a tiny business, when Rule 2 defines it by the medium enterprise ceiling — currently ₹125 crore investment and ₹500 crore turnover. The second most common reason is not holding the certificate at the moment of filing.

32. What should I do before my next trade mark filing?

A. Check whether the applicant entity holds valid Udyam registration or DPIIT recognition. If not, obtain it — Udyam registration is free and completed online. Confirm the certificate is in the exact name of the intended applicant, then file Form TM-A by e-filing with the certificate uploaded and the concessional category selected. For a four- or five-class portfolio, that administrative hour is worth ₹18,000 to ₹22,500.