Nominee Shareholder Services in India: How They Work & When Foreign Companies Need Them A Clear, Honest 2026 Guide

Here is a situation we see at Delhi Legal Company almost every week.

A foreign company — let’s say a software firm from Singapore, a manufacturer from Germany, or a trading house from Dubai — decides to set up a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary in India. The board has approved it. The capital is ready. The name is chosen. And then, somewhere in the first call with their Indian advisor, they hit a sentence that stops them cold:

“You’ll need a second shareholder.”

“But we want to own 100% of it. That’s the whole point.”

“You will own 100% — beneficially. But an Indian private limited company must have at least two shareholders on record. So one share, out of your ten thousand, will be registered in the name of a nominee — who holds it entirely for you, controls nothing, and is documented as such with the Registrar of Companies.”

That single sentence is the reason nominee shareholder services exist in India. It is a small, technical, almost invisible piece of corporate architecture — and yet, done wrong, it has cost foreign companies control battles, tax notices, benami allegations, and years of litigation over a share worth ten rupees.

This guide explains the whole subject clearly and honestly: what a nominee shareholder actually is under Indian law, what it is not (this matters more than you think), exactly when foreign companies need one, the legal framework and mandatory disclosures, how a properly protected arrangement is documented step by step, the risks of doing it casually, and how to choose between a professional nominee and the tempting-but-dangerous alternatives. A detailed FAQ section follows at the end.

One promise before we begin, because the internet is full of the opposite: this guide will not tell you that nominee shareholders give you anonymity in India. They don’t — and any provider who says otherwise is selling you a compliance problem. What they give you is something better: a fully lawful way to hold 100% economic ownership of your Indian company while satisfying the letter of the Companies Act. Let’s unpack it.

---

1. What Is a Nominee Shareholder? Registered Ownership vs Beneficial Ownership

Indian company law quietly recognises two different kinds of “owning” a share.

The registered owner (or registered holder) is the person whose name appears in the company’s Register of Members, on the share certificate, and in the filings at the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. As far as the company’s statutory records are concerned, this person is the shareholder — notices go to them, they sign for the share, and their name is what the public sees.

The beneficial owner is the person who actually enjoys the economics and the substance of the share: the right to the dividends, the value on sale, and the real say in how the vote is cast.

Usually, these two are the same person. A nominee shareholder arrangement is simply the situation where they are deliberately different: one person (the nominee) is entered in the register as the holder of shares, while another person or company (the beneficial owner) owns every economic and controlling interest in those shares. The nominee holds the share in a fiduciary capacity — in trust, on behalf of, and at the direction of the beneficial owner — and has no independent right to vote it, sell it, pledge it, or keep a rupee of dividend from it.

The crucial point — and the foundation of everything that follows — is that Indian law does not merely tolerate this split. It regulates it, through a specific disclosure regime (Sections 89 and 90 of the Companies Act, 2013) that makes the arrangement lawful precisely because it is declared. Hold that thought; we return to it in Section 3.

---

2. Why Does India Force You to Have a Second Shareholder at All?

The requirement feels arbitrary until you see where it comes from. Under the Companies Act, 2013:

• A Private Limited Company — the vehicle used for virtually every foreign subsidiary in India — must have a minimum of two members (shareholders) at all times.
• A Public Limited Company must have a minimum of seven members.
• Only a One Person Company (OPC) may have a single member — but an OPC cannot be incorporated by a body corporate and does not fit foreign-parent structures (its “nominee” is a different concept altogether, which we clarify in the FAQs).

So when a foreign parent wants a subsidiary that is 100% its own, the arithmetic collides with the statute. The universally accepted solution — used by multinationals in India for decades — is elegantly simple:

The foreign parent subscribes to virtually all the shares (say 9,999 out of 10,000), and one share is registered in the name of a nominee, who holds that single share entirely for the beneficial ownership of the parent.

The subsidiary is thereby 100% beneficially foreign-owned — which is exactly how it is treated under FEMA, in the FC-GPR filing, in the consolidated accounts, and commercially — while the Register of Members lawfully shows two names. The nominee’s share is not a 0.01% “partner stake”; it is the parent’s own share, parked in a second name to satisfy a counting rule.

If the company ever does fall below the minimum — for example, a transfer goes wrong and one member remains for more than six months — the continuing member who knows of it can become personally liable for the company’s debts contracted during that period. The two-member floor, in other words, is not a formality you can quietly ignore; it is a rule with teeth, and the nominee is how well-run foreign subsidiaries stay permanently on the right side of it.

---

3. The Honest Part: What a Nominee Shareholder in India Is NOT

This is the section that separates a clear-eyed guide from a sales page, so let us be direct.

3.1 It is not an anonymity device

You will find providers — usually writing about offshore jurisdictions, sometimes carelessly about India — describing nominee shareholders as a way to “keep the real owner’s identity off government records.” In India, that description is simply wrong, and acting on it is dangerous.

Indian law requires the beneficial ownership behind a nominee holding to be declared to the company and filed with the Registrar of Companies:

• Under Section 89 of the Companies Act, the nominee (registered owner) must declare that they hold no beneficial interest, and the beneficial owner must declare their interest — both within strict timelines — and the company must file these declarations with the ROC.
• Under Section 90, every individual who is a Significant Beneficial Owner (SBO) — broadly, an individual holding at least 10% of shares or voting rights indirectly or beneficially, or exercising significant influence — must be identified and reported to the ROC, however many corporate layers sit in between.

So the beneficial owner’s identity is not hidden from the regulator; it is formally filed with the regulator. What the arrangement changes is only the name on the member register — a matter of corporate mechanics, not concealment. A foreign parent using a nominee for its second share is not hiding anything: its 99.99% direct holding is on the register anyway, and the nominee’s single share is declared as beneficially the parent’s.

3.2 It is not a benami transaction — if it is documented and declared

India’s Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act (as strengthened in 2016) prohibits and criminalises arrangements where property is held by one person while the consideration flows from — and the benefit belongs to — another, with penalties extending to confiscation of the property and prosecution. On a lazy reading, every nominee holding sounds benami. It is not — because the Act carves out property held in a fiduciary capacity (trustees, and persons standing in similar positions), and a nominee shareholding that is properly documented as fiduciary and declared under Section 89 sits squarely within the lawful, disclosed category the company-law regime itself creates.

But notice what does the saving: the documentation and the declaration. An undocumented, undeclared “understanding” — shares parked in a cousin’s or employee’s name with nothing in writing and no MGT filings — has none of these protections. It is legally indistinguishable from concealment, and in an era when the MCA actively cross-checks beneficial-ownership filings, it invites exactly the benami and tax scrutiny the formal route is designed to avoid. This single distinction — declared fiduciary holding vs undisclosed front — is the entire difference between a routine corporate structure and a serious legal problem.

3.3 It is not a transfer of any real power

A properly papered nominee cannot vote against you, sell the share, block a resolution, or demand anything. If your nominee can do any of these things, the documentation is defective — and Section 6 of this guide shows what complete documentation looks like.

---

4. When Do Foreign Companies Actually Need a Nominee Shareholder?

In our practice, nominee shareholder mandates arrive in six recurring situations:

Scenario 1 — The 100% Wholly-Owned Subsidiary (the classic case). A foreign parent incorporates an Indian Wholly-Owned Subsidiary and needs a lawful second member. The parent holds all shares but one; the nominee holds that one share beneficially for the parent, declared under Section 89. This accounts for the overwhelming majority of nominee arrangements in India, and it is the structure this guide is primarily written for.

Scenario 2 — Incorporation stage, before the group entity is ready. Sometimes the intended second subscriber — say, another group company — cannot sign, apostille, and return documents in time, and the incorporation timeline cannot wait. A nominee subscribes at incorporation and transfers or continues to hold the share (with declarations) once the structure settles.

Scenario 3 — The departing employee problem. Years ago, someone put the “second share” in the name of a trusted local manager — with nothing in writing. The manager has now resigned, relocated, or fallen out with the company, and the share is stranded in their name. Regularising this — recovering the share, executing proper transfers, completing the overdue declarations — is one of the most common rescue mandates we handle, and the strongest argument for doing it professionally from day one.

Scenario 4 — Group restructurings and share transfers. During mergers, internal reorganisations, or the sale of an Indian entity, shares sometimes need to be held temporarily by a clean, neutral holder while approvals and payments complete — a role a professional nominee performs under escrow-style documentation.

Scenario 5 — Multiple qualifying members for a public company. A foreign-controlled Public Limited Company needs seven members. The parent plus six nominees — each holding a single declared share for the parent — is the standard, lawful way the count is achieved.

Scenario 6 — Continuity and succession. Where an individual founder-owner holds shares in an Indian company from abroad, a nominee-plus-documentation structure (alongside proper wills and transmission planning) keeps the register clean and the company operable if something happens to the individual.

Notice what is absent from this list: hiding ownership from regulators, evading tax residence, defeating creditors, or dodging Press Note 3 scrutiny of land-border-country investors. A reputable provider will decline those mandates — Delhi Legal Company certainly does — because they fail at law, and they fail the client.

---

5. The Legal Framework: Five Laws, One Table

Because the nominee arrangement lives at the junction of several statutes, here is the complete regulatory map — the one table in this guide worth printing:

Two consequences of this framework deserve emphasis.

First, the declarations are not optional paperwork; they are the legal foundation. Until the Section 89 declarations are made and filed, the beneficial owner’s rights in relation to that share are not enforceable by them in respect of the company — meaning a foreign parent that skips a ₹0 form can find itself unable to assert ownership of its own share when it matters most. The company and its officers also face monetary penalties for non-filing.

Second, Section 90 has become an enforcement priority. In recent years the MCA has issued a steady stream of adjudication orders penalising companies — including subsidiaries of well-known multinationals — for late or missing BEN-2 filings, and 2026’s compliance environment (with the MCA’s V3 portal cross-linking filings, and the Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 having offered a one-time window to regularise old defaults) assumes beneficial-ownership transparency as the norm. A foreign group setting up in India should map its SBO chain — the actual individuals at the top of the ownership tree — at incorporation, not when the notice arrives.

---

6. How a Properly Protected Nominee Arrangement Is Built, Step by Step

Here is the uncomfortable truth about nominee arrangements: the share itself is trivial; the protection is everything. One share of ₹10 face value can, if undocumented, give its holder the practical ability to delay filings, contest transfers, and extract a settlement. The professional standard therefore layers five protections around that one share, so that the beneficial owner’s position is unassailable from every direction:

Step 1 — The Nominee / Declaration of Trust Agreement. The cornerstone document. The nominee formally declares that they hold the share as bare trustee for the beneficial owner; that they will vote, act, and sign only as directed in writing; that every dividend, bonus, and rights entitlement belongs to and will be immediately passed to the beneficial owner; that they will never sell, transfer, pledge, or encumber the share; and that they will transfer it to the beneficial owner or its designee on first demand. The agreement includes confidentiality, indemnities both ways (the beneficial owner typically indemnifies the nominee for lawful acts done on instruction; the nominee indemnifies for any unauthorised act), and a clean termination mechanism.

Step 2 — The pre-signed, undated transfer deed (Form SH-4). The nominee signs the statutory share-transfer form in advance, undated, with the transferee left blank or in the beneficial owner’s name, held in escrow by the beneficial owner or its counsel. If the nominee ever becomes uncooperative, unreachable, or deceased-without-cooperative-heirs, the beneficial owner can complete the transfer without needing the nominee’s future goodwill. This single document converts the nominee from “person we must trust forever” into “person we needed once, at signing.”

Step 3 — The Power of Attorney. An irrevocable-in-substance POA from the nominee empowering the beneficial owner’s representatives to attend meetings, vote the share, sign documents, and execute transfers on the nominee’s behalf — the operational mirror of the trust declaration.

Step 4 — The dividend mandate and waiver. A standing instruction that any amount paid on the nominee share is routed to (or held for) the beneficial owner, closing the small but irritating gap where dividends legally flow first to the registered holder.

Step 5 — The statutory declarations, filed on time. MGT-4 from the nominee and MGT-5 from the beneficial owner within 30 days, MGT-6 from the company to the ROC within 30 days of receipt; the SBO analysis under Section 90 completed and BEN-2 filed where applicable; the arrangement noted appropriately in the company’s registers. This is the step that converts a private arrangement into a legally recognised one — and, as Section 3 explained, the step that keeps it decisively outside benami territory.

Alongside these, a professional engagement letter records the service scope, fees, KYC completed on both sides, and the nominee’s entitlement to act on written instructions only. The whole set is executed in a single sitting at the time the share is issued or transferred — after which the arrangement should require nothing from the nominee, possibly for years, except an annual signature or two.

What the documentation deliberately avoids is just as important: no discretion to the nominee, no fee linked to the company’s performance, no ambiguity about who instructs whom, and no side letters contradicting the filed declarations. Clean in substance, clean on paper, clean at the ROC.

---

7. Who Should Your Nominee Be? The Three Options, Compared Honestly

Every foreign company effectively chooses between three kinds of nominee — and the cheapest option is almost always the most expensive one eventually.

Option A — A trusted individual: employee, local manager, friend, relative. The instinctive choice, and the source of most of the rescue mandates we see. The problems are structural, not personal: employees resign and relocate; relationships sour; people pass away and their heirs feel no obligation to your paperwork; and the arrangement is usually made without the documentation of Section 6 precisely because “we trust him.” When it goes wrong, you are negotiating for your own share with someone who holds the registered title — from another country, across a time zone, sometimes through their lawyer. If you nevertheless use a known individual, insist on the complete Section 6 documentation anyway; trust plus paperwork is fine, trust instead of paperwork is not.

Option B — Another group entity. Where the group has a second company available — a Singapore holding entity, a sister subsidiary — making it the second member is often the cleanest structure of all, because the “nominee” is family and the beneficial-interest declarations may not even be needed (each member then holds its own shares beneficially). The limitations are practical: the second entity must exist, be in good standing, and be able to sign and apostille documents on your timeline; and every future group restructuring now touches the Indian register. Many groups deliberately prefer a professional nominee for the single share precisely to keep the Indian cap table insulated from upstream reshuffles.

Option C — A professional nominee service. A regulated local firm provides the nominee — an individual or body corporate whose entire role is fiduciary — under institutional-grade documentation, with KYC, continuity (the firm outlives any individual), indifference (no emotions, no leverage, no opinions about your business), and accountability (a professional reputation and an indemnity behind every signature). This is what Delhi Legal Company’s Nominee Shareholder Services provide, usually bundled with the two sibling services foreign subsidiaries need on day one: a Resident Director (a separate legal requirement — see the next section) and a Registered Office Address.

The honest summary: Option B where the group structure supports it; Option C in every other case; Option A only with full documentation, and even then with a plan for the day the individual is no longer available.

---

8. Nominee Shareholder vs Nominee Director vs Resident Director — Untangling Three Confused Terms

Foreign investors constantly conflate these three, and providers sometimes encourage the confusion. They are different roles answering different legal requirements:

The practical takeaway: a standard foreign WOS in India usually needs both a nominee shareholder (for the member count) and a resident director (for the board) — two distinct legal requirements, two distinct services, often supplied together with the registered office as a single “India presence” package. A nominee director, by contrast, belongs to joint-venture and investment contexts — and, importantly, owes their duties to the Indian company itself, a distinction Indian law takes seriously.

---

9. The Risks Nobody Puts in the Brochure — and How Each One Is Neutralised

An honest guide owes you the failure modes. There are five, and every one has a known antidote:

Risk 1 — The uncooperative or vanished nominee. The share is registered in a name that will no longer sign, or can no longer be found. Neutralised by: the pre-signed SH-4 and POA held in escrow from day one — the beneficial owner never needs the nominee’s future cooperation, only their past signature.

Risk 2 — Death of an individual nominee. The share technically enters the deceased’s estate; heirs and succession certificates get involved — for one ten-rupee share. Neutralised by: the same escrowed documents, a corporate (rather than individual) nominee where possible, and prompt transmission handling. This risk alone justifies the professional route.

Risk 3 — The undeclared arrangement. No MGT-4/5/6, no BEN-2, nothing in writing. As Section 3 explained, this forfeits the fiduciary protection, leaves the beneficial owner’s rights unenforceable in respect of the share, exposes the company and officers to penalties, and hands any future tax or benami inquiry its opening paragraph. Neutralised by: filing the declarations on time, every time — and regularising legacy arrangements now, voluntarily, rather than after a notice.

Risk 4 — The over-empowered nominee. Sloppy documents that give the nominee actual discretion, or fees tied to company performance, blur the fiduciary line the whole structure depends on. Neutralised by: the “no discretion, instructions-only” drafting standard of Section 6, reviewed by counsel who has seen these arrangements contested.

Risk 5 — Confusing the nominee share with control. Occasionally a foreign parent’s own team forgets the nominee share exists — until a transfer, buy-back, or exit stalls because one signature was never collected, or an FC-TRS treats the share inconsistently. Neutralised by: keeping the nominee share on the company’s compliance calendar like any other statutory item, and running exits through advisors who check the whole register, not just the big number.

Read the list again and a pattern emerges: every risk is a documentation risk. The nominee structure itself is legally sound, decades-tested, and used by the most conservative multinationals in India. It fails only when it is done informally — which is why the service, done properly, is fundamentally a documentation and compliance service with a signature attached, not the other way around.

---

10. What a Professional Nominee Shareholder Service Actually Includes — and Roughly Costs

When you engage Delhi Legal Company for nominee shareholder services, the engagement typically covers: KYC and onboarding on both sides; provision of the nominee (individual or body corporate, as the structure requires); drafting and execution of the complete protection set — nominee agreement/declaration of trust, escrowed SH-4, POA, dividend mandate, indemnities; preparation and filing of MGT-4, MGT-5 and MGT-6 within their 30-day windows; the Section 90 SBO analysis for your group chain and BEN filings where applicable; annual cooperation (signing AGM documents, confirmations, auditor requests relating to the share); and prompt execution of transfer or termination documents whenever you restructure or exit — coordinated with the FC-TRS and RBI documentation a resident–non-resident transfer requires.

On cost: professional nominee shareholding in India is priced as a modest annual fee (with a one-time documentation charge at setup), and is most economical bundled with the resident director and registered office services a foreign subsidiary needs anyway. Against the cost of even one stranded-share dispute — or one MCA adjudication order for missing beneficial-ownership filings — it is among the cheapest insurance a foreign investor buys in India. For a specific quotation for your structure, write to info@delhilegalcompany.com or call +91-9599332456.

A note on what we will not do, because “honest guide” cuts both ways: we do not provide nominees to conceal beneficial ownership from Indian regulators, to circumvent Press Note 3 scrutiny of land-border-country investment, to defeat creditors or spouses or tax authorities, or under undocumented “gentleman’s arrangements.” Those requests fail at law, and a provider willing to take them is a provider willing to fail you too.

---

11. How Delhi Legal Company Fits In

Delhi Legal Company is a Delhi-based business consultancy specialising in helping foreign companies establish and operate in India — end to end, as one accountable on-ground partner. Nominee shareholder services sit inside that larger picture:

Setting up — Wholly-Owned Subsidiary and Private Limited Company incorporation, with the nominee shareholder, Resident Director, and Registered Office supplied together as your complete statutory presence from day one.

Staying compliant — the Section 89/90 declarations, annual ROC filings, FEMA & FDI reporting, statutory registers, board resolutions & minutes, and the full accounting, payroll and tax stack.

Fixing the past — regularising legacy nominee arrangements: recovering stranded shares, completing overdue MGT/BEN filings, and rebuilding the documentation to the professional standard described in this guide.

Moving on — share transfers, restructurings and exits in which the nominee share is transferred, released, or re-papered cleanly, with every FEMA filing in place.

Contact: 4th Floor, E Block, Innov8 Workspaces, Harsha Bhawan, 13/29, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110001 | +91-9599332456 | info@delhilegalcompany.com | Book a consultation

---

12. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. What is a nominee shareholder in simple terms? A person or entity whose name appears in the company’s register as the holder of shares, while every real right in those shares — dividends, value, voting direction, the right to sell — belongs to someone else (the beneficial owner). The nominee holds the shares in a fiduciary capacity and acts only on the beneficial owner’s instructions.

Q2. Why does a foreign company that wants 100% ownership need one? Because an Indian private limited company must have at least two registered members. The foreign parent holds all shares but one; a nominee holds the remaining share beneficially for the parent. The subsidiary is 100% beneficially foreign-owned — the nominee share exists purely to satisfy the two-member rule.

Q3. Is a nominee shareholder arrangement legal in India? Yes — expressly so. Section 89 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides the exact mechanism: the registered holder declares they hold no beneficial interest (Form MGT-4), the beneficial owner declares their interest (Form MGT-5), and the company files both with the Registrar of Companies (Form MGT-6). Properly declared, the arrangement is a recognised, routine feature of Indian corporate practice.

Q4. Does a nominee shareholder keep my identity secret? No — and be wary of anyone who says otherwise. The beneficial owner’s identity is disclosed to the company and filed with the ROC under Section 89, and the individuals ultimately behind the structure are reported under the Significant Beneficial Ownership rules (Section 90, Forms BEN-1/BEN-2). What changes is only the name on the member register, not what the regulator knows. In India, the arrangement is lawful because it is disclosed.

Q5. Isn’t holding shares in someone else’s name “benami”? An undisclosed, undocumented arrangement can be — with confiscation and prosecution risk under the Benami Act. A documented nominee holding declared under Section 89 is a fiduciary holding, which the benami framework excludes. The entire legal difference lies in the paperwork and the filings, which is why professional documentation is not optional.

Q6. What forms and deadlines apply? MGT-4 (nominee) and MGT-5 (beneficial owner) within 30 days of the share being so held or of any change; MGT-6 filed by the company with the ROC within 30 days of receiving them. Where an individual qualifies as a Significant Beneficial Owner, BEN-1 from the individual and BEN-2 from the company (within 30 days) apply. Late or missing filings attract penalties — and, critically, until declaration, the beneficial owner cannot enforce their rights in that share in relation to the company.

Q7. Who receives the dividend on the nominee share? Formally it is payable to the registered holder, but a properly papered nominee holds it entirely for the beneficial owner and passes it on under a standing dividend mandate. Economically and for tax purposes, the dividend is the beneficial owner’s.

Q8. Can the nominee vote against us, sell the share, or block anything? Not under proper documentation. The nominee agreement removes all discretion; the power of attorney lets your representatives act directly; and the pre-signed, escrowed transfer deed (Form SH-4) means you can move the share out of the nominee’s name at any time without their further cooperation.

Q9. What happens if an individual nominee dies or disappears? With professional documentation, very little: the escrowed transfer deed and POA let the beneficial owner complete a transfer without the nominee. Without documentation, the share can get entangled in the individual’s estate or goodwill — the classic stranded-share problem, and the strongest argument for either a corporate nominee or the full protection set from day one.

Q10. Can the nominee be a company instead of a person? Yes — a body corporate can be a registered member, and a corporate nominee eliminates the death/relocation risks of an individual. Many professional arrangements use a corporate nominee for exactly this reason. (The one exception: subscribers to an OPC, which in any case is not a foreign-parent structure.)

Q11. Is the nominee’s share counted as foreign investment under FEMA? Yes. Because the share is beneficially owned by the foreign parent, the company’s entire capital — including the nominee share — is foreign investment, reported accordingly in the FC-GPR at allotment and the annual FLA return. Treating the nominee share inconsistently in FEMA filings is a small error with outsized consequences at exit.

Q12. Is a nominee shareholder the same as a resident director? No — they answer two different legal requirements. The nominee shareholder satisfies the minimum-members rule and sits on the register, not the board. The resident director satisfies Section 149(3) (at least one director resident in India 182+ days a year) and sits on the board with full directors’ duties. A typical foreign WOS needs both, and Delhi Legal Company provides both, usually together with the registered office.

Q13. And is it the same as an OPC “nominee”? No. In a One Person Company, the nominee (named in Form INC-3) is a succession mechanism — the person who becomes the member if the sole member dies. It has nothing to do with holding shares for a beneficial owner, and OPCs are not available to corporate or foreign-parent structures anyway.

Q14. How many nominees does a foreign-controlled public limited company need? A public company needs seven members, so the parent plus six single-share nominees (each declared under Section 89) is the standard structure. Most foreign investors, however, use a private limited company — where one nominee suffices — unless an IPO or public-company feature is specifically required.

Q15. We set up years ago with a share in an employee’s name and no paperwork. What now? Regularise it — voluntarily and soon. That means executing the full documentation set, completing the overdue Section 89 declarations (and BEN filings if applicable), and, where relationships allow, transferring the share to a professional or corporate nominee. Acting before any notice arrives is dramatically cheaper than after; this is one of Delhi Legal Company’s most common rescue mandates.

Q16. What does the service cost? A one-time documentation fee at setup plus a modest annual fee, lowest when bundled with resident-director and registered-office services. Given that the alternative failure modes include stranded shares, estate disputes and beneficial-ownership penalties, it is best understood as inexpensive structural insurance. Contact us for a quotation specific to your structure.

Q17. Can a nominee arrangement be used to hide ownership from Indian regulators or get around Press Note 3? No — and a reputable provider will refuse the mandate. Beneficial ownership must be declared under Sections 89 and 90 regardless of who holds the registered title, FDI screening looks to beneficial ownership including for land-border-country rules, and undisclosed fronting invites benami consequences. The lawful arrangement is transparent to the regulator by design; that transparency is precisely what makes it safe.

Q18. How quickly can a nominee arrangement be put in place? For a new incorporation, it adds essentially no time — the documentation is executed alongside the subscription papers, and the declarations are filed within their 30-day windows after the shares are held. For an existing company, a clean handover (transfer to the new nominee plus fresh declarations) is typically completed within one to two weeks, subject to KYC and, where a non-resident is transferring, the FC-TRS process.

---