1Why 2026 matters for brand owners

---

A trademark is often the most valuable asset a business owns. It is the name customers search for, the logo they trust and the reputation a company spends years building. In India, where the Trade Marks Registry receives several lakh applications every year and where brand disputes are increasingly litigated before commercial courts, understanding the rules that govern trademarks is not a matter for lawyers alone. It is a business necessity.

2026 has produced more change in day-to-day trademark practice than any year since the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 came into force. Within a few months, the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM) made electronic identity verification compulsory for professionals using its portals, released a revised draft of the manual that governs how Registry officers handle applications, gave clearer shape to the procedure for declaring a mark well-known, and began operating in a world where the international classification of goods and services had been re-cut.

Not surprisingly, this has produced a wave of headlines and blog posts announcing “new Trademark Rules 2026”. Some of these are useful; others overstate the position or describe amendments that cannot be traced to any official notification. For a business deciding when to file, how to respond to an objection or whether to seek well-known status, the difference between a statutory rule and a draft administrative guideline is significant. One is binding law; the other is a statement of intended practice.

This guide is written to give founders, in-house counsel, marketing heads and foreign companies entering India a single, reliable reference. We explain the legal architecture first, then the pre-2026 position, then each 2026 development in detail, followed by a full comparison table, sector-specific impact, a myth-buster and a practical checklist.

2How Indian trademark law is structured

---

Before assessing what changed, it helps to know where each type of change sits in the legal hierarchy. Indian trademark governance operates at five levels, and each carries a different weight.

The Act defines what a trademark is, what cannot be registered (for example, marks devoid of distinctive character under Section 9, or marks conflicting with earlier rights under Section 11), how infringement is established and what remedies are available. Only Parliament can change it.

The Rules are made by the Central Government under the rule-making power in the Act. They fix the forms, official fees, deadlines and the mechanics of examination, opposition, hearings and renewal. Rules are amended by notification in the Official Gazette, usually after a draft is published for public comment.

Public notices issued by the CGPDTM do not amend the Act or Rules but carry practical force: if a notice says the portal will only be accessible after e-KYC, a professional who ignores it cannot file. The manual sits at the base: it explains how the Registry applies the law and is subordinate to everything above it. Where a manual conflicts with the Act or the Rules, the Act and Rules prevail.

3From the 1958 Act to the 2017 Rules

---

India's modern trademark system has evolved in clear stages, each responding to the economic conditions of its time.

• 1958
  The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 governed trademarks for over four decades. It protected goods but did not provide for registration of service marks, a significant gap as India's services economy grew.
• 1999
  The Trade Marks Act, 1999 was enacted to bring Indian law in line with the TRIPS Agreement. It introduced service marks, collective marks, statutory recognition of well-known marks and a longer ten-year term of registration.
• 2002–03
  The Trade Marks Rules, 2002 operationalised the new Act, which came into force in September 2003.
• 2010–13
  The Act was amended to allow India to join the Madrid Protocol, enabling international registrations to designate India and Indian applicants to extend protection abroad.
• 2017
  The Trade Marks Rules, 2017 replaced the 2002 Rules, consolidating forms, encouraging e-filing, introducing a direct route to well-known status and tightening hearing practice.
• 2026
  Administrative modernisation: e-KYC, a revised draft manual, structured well-known mark procedure and the Nice 13th edition.

Seen this way, 2026 is the next step in a long movement towards a digital, predictable and internationally aligned trademark office. It builds on 2017 rather than replacing it.

4The pre-2026 framework in detail

---

Because the 2017 Rules remain in force, everything in this section continues to apply in 2026. Understanding it is the baseline for measuring what is new.

4.1 The eight consolidated forms

One of the most practical reforms of 2017 was reducing a long list of forms under the 2002 Rules to a small, consolidated set. Each form now covers a family of requests:

4.2 Official fees and the e-filing incentive

The 2017 Rules introduced a two-tier fee structure that rewards smaller applicants and online filing. An individual, a startup or a small enterprise pays a reduced official fee per class, while other entities pay a higher fee. Filing online is cheaper than filing physically, which has pushed the overwhelming majority of filings onto the e-filing portal.

4.3 The registration journey

The basic route from idea to registered trademark has not changed. A well-managed application typically moves through these stages:

1. Clearance search. Search the Registry database for identical and similar marks in the relevant and allied classes. A proper trademark search and advisory exercise is the cheapest way to avoid a refusal or a dispute later.
2. Class selection and specification. Identify the right classes and draft the goods and services description carefully. Our guide to class selection and filing strategy explains why this step decides how broad your protection will be.
3. Filing on Form TM-A. Submit the application online with the mark, applicant details, user claim (“proposed to be used” or a date of first use) and, where needed, a user affidavit. See our trademark registration service.
4. Examination. The Registry examines the application on absolute grounds (Section 9) and relative grounds (Section 11) and issues an examination report.
5. Reply to examination report. The applicant generally has one month to file a reply. A well-reasoned reply to objections and office actions often avoids a hearing altogether.
6. Show cause hearing. If the reply does not satisfy the examiner, the matter is listed for a hearing, now commonly conducted by video conference.
7. Publication in the Trade Marks Journal. Accepted marks are advertised so that third parties can object.
8. Opposition window. Any person may oppose within four months of publication. The applicant must then file a counter-statement within two months. Our team handles opposition filing and defence.
9. Registration. If there is no opposition, or the opposition fails, the mark proceeds to registration and a certificate is issued.
10. Renewal every ten years. Registration lasts ten years from the application date and can be renewed indefinitely. See trademark assignment and renewal.

4.4 Key innovations of the 2017 Rules

4.5 Where the pre-2026 system fell short

Despite these advances, practitioners and applicants regularly pointed to three gaps. First, practice varied between Registry offices in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai and Ahmedabad, so similar applications could be treated differently. Second, there was no robust identity verification of the professionals filing on behalf of clients, which made it harder to trace accountability for fraudulent or careless filings. Third, some proceedings, particularly well-known mark determinations and show cause hearings, lacked detailed published procedure, leaving applicants uncertain about notice periods and how objections would be handled. The 2026 developments respond directly to each of these gaps.

4.6 Grounds of refusal: still the main battleground

None of the 2026 developments alter the grounds on which an application can be refused, and these remain the most common reason applications stall. Understanding them before filing is the single best way to reduce cost and delay.

Absolute grounds (Section 9)

These relate to the mark itself. A mark may be refused if it is devoid of distinctive character, if it consists only of words or signs that describe the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, value or geographical origin of the goods or services, or if it has become customary in the trade. Marks that are likely to deceive the public, hurt religious sentiments, or contain scandalous or obscene matter are also barred. A descriptive mark can still succeed if the applicant shows it has acquired distinctiveness through use, which is why sales and advertising evidence is valuable from day one.

Relative grounds (Section 11)

These relate to earlier rights. A mark may be refused if it is identical or similar to an earlier mark for identical or similar goods or services and there is a likelihood of confusion, or if it would take unfair advantage of, or harm, the reputation of an earlier well-known mark. Most examination objections in practice are raised under this section, citing earlier marks found in the Registry's search.

52026 at a glance

---

Here is a summary of the four developments that define trademark practice in India in 2026, each examined in detail in the sections that follow.

“2026 did not change what a trademark owner is entitled to. It changed how carefully that entitlement must be managed.”

6Mandatory e-KYC on the IP India portal

---

The most immediate operational change of 2026 was the introduction of compulsory electronic Know Your Customer (e-KYC) verification for professionals practising before the IP Office.

6.1 How the requirement unfolded

• 9 July 2026
  A public notice made e-KYC mandatory for all IP attorneys enrolled in the register maintained by the CGPDTM and for those accessing the IP India online portals, with one month to comply.
• 4 August 2026
  An open house session was held to hear stakeholder concerns and technical difficulties.
• 7 August 2026
  The deadline was extended from 9 August to 31 August 2026.
• 12 August 2026
  Virtual help sessions were announced to resolve technical issues.
• Final extension
  The last date was moved from 31 August to 30 September 2026.

6.2 What it means in practice

The e-KYC form sits on the IP India e-filing portal and is accessed with the attorney's existing login credentials. Once the requirement took effect, continued access to the online portals became conditional on completing it. Technical queries were directed to the IP Office support channels.

6.3 Why the Registry introduced it

Electronic verification strengthens the integrity of the register. It helps the Office confirm that the person filing is the registered professional they claim to be, which is important in a system where a single filing can block a competitor's brand or where a fraudulent assignment can transfer valuable rights. It also aligns the IP Office with the broader move across Indian regulators, such as the Ministry of Corporate Affairs with Director KYC, towards verified digital identities.

7The revised Draft Manual of Trade Marks Practice and Procedure

---

On 21 August 2026, the CGPDTM issued a public notice releasing a revised draft of the Manual of Trade Marks Practice and Procedure and inviting comments within fifteen days, which placed the consultation window at roughly 5 September 2026. The revised draft follows an earlier version circulated for comment in 2025 and was released alongside an updated draft manual for the Patent Office.

7.1 What a practice manual is — and is not

The manual is the Registry's working rulebook. It tells officers how to receive documents, how to examine an application, how to run a hearing and how to deal with oppositions, rectifications and post-registration requests. Its stated objective is uniformity across Registry offices and greater clarity for applicants, agents and officers.

It is not legislation. It cannot create new rights or remove existing ones, and the draft itself acknowledges that the Act and the Rules prevail in the event of any inconsistency. However, once finalised, it will strongly shape everyday outcomes, because officers will be expected to follow it.

7.2 Chapter-by-chapter overview

7.3 Filing and examination (Chapters 1 and 2)

For most applicants, these chapters will feel familiar. They consolidate existing law and workflow rather than creating new obligations. Their value lies in setting out, in one place, how examiners should approach distinctiveness, descriptiveness, deceptive similarity and conflicts with earlier marks. Over time this should reduce the inconsistency that applicants have experienced between offices and officers, and make examination reports more predictable to answer.

7.4 Show cause hearings (Chapter 3)

Chapter 3 is the part of the draft that practitioners are watching most closely. It deals with applications that are not resolved on paper and proceed to a hearing. The draft proposes that the hearing notice be sent by email to the applicant or agent approximately 30 days before the hearing date, drawing on a 2024 order of the Delhi High Court.

This addresses a long-standing complaint: applicants sometimes received very short notice of hearings and, if they missed them, faced the risk of their application being treated as abandoned. The Trade Marks Rules, 2017 do not themselves prescribe a fixed 30-day notice period, so until the manual is finalised this should be treated as proposed practice rather than an enforceable statutory deadline.

7.5 Opposition, amendment and post-registration (Chapters 4 to 6)

These chapters explain how the Registry administers oppositions, rectification and cancellation, how applications may be amended or divided before registration, and how registered marks are renewed, restored, assigned and licensed. For businesses, the most relevant parts relate to assignments and registered users, which matter in mergers, group restructurings and licensing. If you are transferring a brand within a group or to a buyer, our IP transfer and assignment documents and brand licensing agreements services help ensure the paperwork matches what the Registry will expect.

7.6 Does anything change for my pending application?

No. The draft does not alter any existing deadline, fee, form or evidentiary requirement. Until it is finalised, all proceedings continue under the Act, the 2017 Rules and existing Registry practice. If your mark is under examination, listed for hearing, opposed or due for renewal, follow the deadline in the notice or order that applies to your case.

8Well-known trademarks in 2026

---

Well-known status is the strongest form of trademark protection available in India. Section 2(1)(zg) of the Act defines a well-known mark as one that has become so familiar to a substantial segment of the public using the relevant goods or services that its use on other goods or services is likely to suggest a connection with the original proprietor.

8.1 Why well-known status is valuable

• Protection across classes. A well-known mark is protected even against use on unrelated goods and services.
• Registry-level shield. The Registrar is required to protect a well-known mark against later identical or similar marks, so conflicting applications can be refused at examination.
• Enforcement leverage. Recognition strengthens infringement and passing off claims and supports domain name and marketplace takedowns.
• Commercial value. Inclusion in the official list of well-known marks enhances brand valuation in fundraising, licensing and M&A.

8.2 The legal test

Sections 11(6) and 11(7) list the factors the Registrar considers, including the knowledge and recognition of the mark in the relevant section of the public, the duration, extent and geographical area of use and promotion, registrations and applications, and the record of successful enforcement, particularly recognition as well-known by a court or the Registrar. Section 11(9) is equally important: the Registrar cannot insist that the mark has been used in India, is registered in India or is well known to the public at large in India.

8.3 Pre-2026 vs 2026 procedure

8.4 Building a winning well-known application

Because the legal test and fee are unchanged, success depends on the quality of evidence. A strong file usually contains:

• Year-wise sales turnover and advertising expenditure, certified by a chartered accountant.
• Evidence of geographic reach in India and abroad, such as distributor lists, store locations and online sales data.
• Media coverage, awards, rankings and independent market surveys.
• Trademark registrations in India and other jurisdictions.
• Court orders, Registry decisions and successful brand enforcement actions, including injunctions and settlements.
• Digital footprint: website traffic, social media following and app downloads.

9Nice Classification, 13th edition

---

Indian trademark applications classify goods and services using the international Nice system, which divides them into 45 classes (34 for goods and 11 for services). The 13th edition, version 2026, came into force internationally on 1 January 2026, and WIPO applies it to international applications received from that date.

9.1 Key reclassifications

9.2 What it means for Indian businesses

Existing registrations are generally not reclassified; they keep the classification that applied when they were filed. New applications, however, must be drafted using the current classification. This has three practical consequences:

1. Clearance searches must look in both places. An earlier conflicting mark for sunglasses may sit in Class 9, while your new application must be in Class 10. A search of only one class can miss it.
2. Portfolio gaps may appear. An eyewear brand protected only in Class 9 should consider whether a fresh Class 10 filing is needed for new product lines.
3. Technology companies get clarity. The specific AIaaS entry in Class 42 makes it easier for AI startups to describe their services accurately.

If you are unsure how the new edition affects your brand, our class selection and filing strategy team can audit your specifications.

10Other developments to watch

---

10.1 Adjudication of offences under Section 107

In July 2024, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry published draft Trade Marks (Holding Inquiry and Appeal) Rules, 2024, setting out an electronic procedure for complaints about contraventions under Section 107 of the Act, which concerns falsely representing a trademark as registered. The draft contemplates online complaints, fixed timelines for inquiries and appeals, and digitally signed orders published on the IP India website. Businesses should check whether these rules have been finalised before relying on them, but they signal the same direction as the 2026 changes: digital, time-bound procedure.

10.2 Increasing reliance on electronic communication

With e-KYC, email hearing notices and online-only processes, the Registry is moving firmly towards digital-first administration. The practical risk for applicants has shifted from paperwork to inbox management: missed emails are now the most common cause of avoidable procedural loss.

10.3 Finalisation of the manual

Once the Registry finalises the manual, provisions that go beyond the text of the Rules, such as the proposed hearing-notice period, will become the reference point for officers. Applicants should watch for the final version and any further public notices that accompany it.

10.4 Possible formal amendments to the Rules

Any formal amendment to the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 must be notified in the Official Gazette, normally after publication of a draft for comment. If such an amendment is notified, it will be the first significant change to the Rules themselves since 2017. We will update this guide when that happens.

11Pre-2026 vs 2026: full comparison

---

The pattern is clear. Substantive rights, costs and statutory timelines are untouched. Change is concentrated in access, procedure and classification, which is exactly where day-to-day mistakes happen.

12Impact on startups, MSMEs and foreign companies

---

12.1 Startups and MSMEs

For early-stage businesses, the good news is that the reduced official fee for individuals, startups and small enterprises remains in place. The main 2026 risks are procedural. Many startups file through low-cost online platforms and rarely check the Registry record afterwards. With communications increasingly by email and portal access now tied to verified professionals, a startup should know exactly who its agent is, whether that agent is e-KYC compliant and which email address is on file. Founders setting up a new entity should also align brand ownership with the company: if you are incorporating a private limited company, LLP or One Person Company, consider whether the trademark should be filed in the company's name from the outset or formally assigned to it.

12.2 Established brands

Established brands benefit most from the clearer well-known procedure and the push towards uniform examination. They should audit their portfolios for Nice 13th edition gaps, assemble reputation evidence and maintain an active watch on the Trade Marks Journal. A structured brand monitoring and enforcement programme, supported by prompt infringement notices, remains the most effective defence against copycats.

12.3 Foreign companies entering India

Foreign businesses can protect their marks in India either by filing directly through an Indian trademark agent or advocate, or by designating India through the Madrid Protocol. Direct filing requires an address for service in India and a power of attorney in favour of the Indian representative. In 2026, the key additional check is that your Indian representative is e-KYC compliant, since a foreign applicant typically depends entirely on that professional's portal access.

Trademark protection should be planned alongside market entry. Whether you are setting up a wholly-owned subsidiary, a liaison office or a joint venture, decide early whether the Indian entity will own the mark or use it under licence from the parent. That decision affects royalty payments, tax, transfer pricing and enforcement. Our guide on setting up a business in India and the compliance calendar for foreign-owned Indian companies cover the wider picture, and our royalty agreements service covers intra-group licensing.

12.4 Technology and digital businesses

Software, SaaS and AI companies should take note of the new AIaaS entry in Class 42 and review whether their specifications describe their services accurately. Trademark protection works best alongside copyright protection for code and content; see our software, website and digital content protection and technology licensing agreements services.

13Common myths about “Trademark Rules 2026”

---

14Your 2026 trademark action checklist

---

• Confirm your representative's e-KYC status in writing, especially if you have pending replies, hearings or oppositions.
• Update your contact details on the Registry record and make sure the registered email is monitored daily.
• Audit your portfolio for Nice 13th edition gaps, particularly for eyewear, apparel, essential oils and AI services.
• Run a fresh clearance search before any launch, covering both old and new classes for reclassified goods.
• Diarise every deadline: one month for examination replies, four months for oppositions, two months for counter-statements, and renewal dates.
• Check ownership alignment: make sure marks are owned by the right group entity, and record any assignment with the Registry.
• Build a reputation file if your brand may qualify as well-known.
• Set up a Trade Marks Journal watch so that conflicting applications are spotted within the opposition window.
• Track the final manual and adjust your hearing and opposition strategy once it is published.

15How Delhi Legal Company can help

---

Delhi Legal Company supports Indian businesses and foreign companies through the full trademark lifecycle, from the first search to enforcement. Explore our Trademark, IP & Legal Filings practice or go straight to the service you need:

16Conclusion

---

The phrase “Trademark Rules 2026” captures a real shift, but not the one many headlines suggest. The legal foundation of Indian trademark law, the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017, is unchanged. What has changed is the environment in which that law is administered: verified digital identities for professionals, a consolidated and more transparent operational manual, a clearer pathway to well-known status, and an updated international classification.

For brand owners, these changes reward discipline. Businesses that keep accurate records, monitor their inboxes and the Trade Marks Journal, choose representatives carefully and plan filings around the current classification will find the 2026 system faster and more predictable. Those that treat registration as a one-time event risk losing rights through procedural lapses that have nothing to do with the strength of their brand.

The best time to review your trademark portfolio against these developments is now, before the manual is finalised and before your next launch or renewal.

Is your trademark portfolio 2026-ready?

Speak to Delhi Legal Company's trademark team for a portfolio review, a clearance search or help with a pending objection, opposition or renewal.

Book a consultation Explore trademark services

Call +91-9599332456  |  Email info@delhilegalcompany.com

?Frequently asked questions

---

Have new Trade Marks Rules been notified in India in 2026?

No. As of October 2026, the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 continue to govern trademark registration and proceedings. The 2026 changes are administrative and procedural, introduced through public notices, a draft manual and the international classification system.

Who must complete e-KYC with IP India?

The 9 July 2026 public notice applies to IP attorneys, including trademark and patent agents, enrolled with the CGPDTM and using the IP India online portals. After two extensions, the final deadline was 30 September 2026. If you file through a professional, confirm that they are compliant.

Is the Draft Manual of Trade Marks Practice and Procedure 2026 binding?

No. It is a draft operational guide for the Registry. The Act and Rules prevail over it, and existing practice continues until it is finalised. Once final, officers will be expected to follow it, so it will shape everyday outcomes.

Will I now get 30 days' notice of a show cause hearing?

The draft manual proposes that hearing notices be emailed roughly 30 days in advance. Until the manual is finalised, treat this as proposed practice, not a guaranteed right, and monitor your registered email closely.

Does the Nice Classification 13th edition affect my existing registration?

Generally no. Existing registrations keep the classification that applied when filed. The 13th edition matters for new applications, clearance searches and portfolio planning.

What is the official fee to have a trademark declared well-known?

A request under Rule 124 is filed on Form TM-M with an official fee of INR 1,00,000. This has not changed in 2026. Professional fees for preparing evidence are additional.

Do I need to re-file a pending application because of the 2026 changes?

No. Pending applications continue under the existing Act, Rules and Registry practice. Follow the deadlines in your examination report, hearing notice or order.

How long does a trademark registration last in India?

Ten years from the date of application, renewable indefinitely for successive ten-year periods. Renewal can be filed in advance of expiry, and late renewal or restoration is possible within limited periods on payment of additional fees.

Can a foreign company register a trademark in India?

Yes. A foreign company can file directly through an Indian trademark agent or advocate, with an address for service in India, or designate India through the Madrid Protocol.

How long does it take to register a trademark in India?

Timelines vary with examination backlogs, objections and oppositions. An unopposed application without objections can register within months, while contested matters can take considerably longer. Expedited examination is available for an additional fee.